The capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by US forces has sparked a heated debate about the legality of Donald Trump's actions. The White House did not seek congressional authorization for the operation, which has been met with outrage from some members of Congress.
The Trump administration has justified the action as a law enforcement operation, citing Maduro's indictment on narcoterrorism charges. However, experts argue that this does not provide sufficient legal basis for the use of military force to capture a foreign leader. The US Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, and the War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops.
The operation has also raised concerns about its implications for international law and sovereignty. Venezuela's government has condemned the action as a "blatant use of force" and an attack on its sovereignty. The international community is divided, with some countries expressing support for the US action and others condemning it.
The situation remains fluid, with Maduro facing charges in the US and the Trump administration indicating plans to "run" Venezuela temporarily. The move has sparked questions about the future of Venezuelan governance and the limits of presidential power.

